( z" H: x/ D1 r1 a' A# m“每一天美國消費者從中國購買的東西都要超出美國向中國出售的東西10億美元。在去掉石油進口之後，美國的商品貿易逆差的70%是跟中國的貿易逆差造成的。這種對中國進口的依賴導致民主的美國欠世界最大的共産黨國家一萬多億美元，而中國有3萬多億美元的外匯儲備，其中大部分是以美元結算的。” 1 @+ t' T5 Y h0 X' _0 X) a公仔箱論壇TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。0 ~' L/ ^7 _/ U, _! K2 I8 C* I
“我們如何消除，或者至少大大減少對中國的貿易逆差呢？首先，我們必須戳穿那種神話，這就是中國的製造業比我們強，主要是因為勞動力成本低廉。確實，低廉的勞動力成本是一個因素，但假如人們仔細研究中國製造業的優勢，就會看到其優勢實際上是許多不公平的貿易做法的複雜組合，所有的那些做法按自由貿易規則來説都是非法的。”tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb) p. u* F. U/ p. E8 C% D x
: q, y1 C) I! e) |
納瓦羅教授接著列舉了中國的不公平以及非法的貿易做法，其中包括貿易補貼、明目張膽地盜竊美國的技術和商業機密，偽造美國名牌産品，操縱貨幣匯率，強迫希望在中國營業或銷售的美國公司轉讓技術，等等。www2.tvboxnow.com/ R5 W. p8 O7 b- I- e' t2 `
% v* g6 s1 d1 ?www2.tvboxnow.com納瓦羅教授接著寫道，“除此之外，中國共産黨目光短淺得令人難以置信，願意以巨大的環境破壞和大量的工作場所傷亡來換取一丁點生産成本的節省，而做到這一切的原因就是極為鬆懈的行業管制規則。例如，據世界衛生組織報告，空氣污染每年造成將近70萬中國人死亡，相當於每年美國懷俄明州的人口全部死光。與此同時，中國官員承認，每年死於煤礦礦難的人有2000多人，而美國只有50多人。” ( n, d1 B. k1 w; G x. G; |/ _0 ?TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 - d% n R$ e% ? g% z公仔箱論壇“事情很清楚。（中國用來佔美國上風的）所有這一切實實在在的經濟武器導致美國成千上萬的工廠關閉，導致美國成百萬的工人失業。而這一切都是在自由貿易的虛假旗號下進行的。” . g4 ?2 t! q' ^' H2 T/ j5 Rtvb now,tvbnow,bttvb g4 G9 x; @# v* D+ p
7 o j1 Q5 y P/ t htvb now,tvbnow,bttvb以上是美國各地主要媒體有關中國的評論。評論所反映的觀點為發表評論媒體之觀點，並不一定代表美國之音的觀點。 l, v3 p4 ?$ ]5 W9 V$ Y
本帖最後由 aa00 於 2011-6-26 10:22 AM 編輯 TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。; }" C0 J, _8 F) @3 k k* n
www2.tvboxnow.com' V3 P! t7 g3 ]* v+ P$ H' E9 b+ I. ~- }
How China unfairly bests the U.S. China's manufacturing advantage over the U.S. is actually due to a complex array of unfair trade practices, all of which are illegal under free-trade rules.$ o. A% `6 B7 s) g3 `
0 V/ \& h$ K( O) r) P公仔箱論壇 2 G( V, e8 R! `, Q- T1 q& P& m+ k( _* ?5 l' |0 y
June 21, 2011|By Peter Navarro : M/ ^& N3 c+ y+ E8 r ; M7 W, L: G0 [& c( P Vtvb now,tvbnow,bttvbwww2.tvboxnow.com$ \+ z% f% ?+ }% n' @! o
The American economy has been in trouble for more than a decade, and no amount of right-wing tax cuts or left-wing fiscal stimuli will solve the primary structural problem underpinning our slow growth and high unemployment. That problem is a massive, persistent trade deficit — most of it with China — that cuts the number of jobs created by nearly the number we need to keep America fully employed.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb4 [% N7 M/ x# l
* b2 _1 K- i% A8 K3 a: _& ~ , x5 x; E. K7 t2 _# a公仔箱論壇To understand why huge U.S. trade deficits represent the taproot of the nation's economic woes, it's crucial to understand that four factors drive our gross domestic product: consumption, business investment, government spending and net exports. This discussion focuses on net exports. Q* a) Z8 [4 G. b t公仔箱論壇Net exports represent the difference between how much we export and import. A trade deficit means net exports are negative, and that directly reduces both the GDP growth rate and rate of job creation.8 \; p* o5 N' Y4 u d. T7 c
( Y/ c8 s: e5 z; m. H% N3 M ETVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。America's trade deficit is costing us close to 1% of GDP growth a year at a loss of almost 1 million jobs annually. That's millions of jobs we have failed to create over the last decade; and if we had those jobs now, we wouldn't see continuing high unemployment numbers, padlocked houses under foreclosure and empty factories pushing up weeds.公仔箱論壇. H. t G9 t: R) F( `
/ [7 W5 R# a' {& c2 j3 S6 A% b公仔箱論壇It follows that if we want to get America back to work, we need to sharply reduce our trade deficit. As a statistical matter, that means sharply reducing our trade deficit with China.www2.tvboxnow.com# }0 n" k7 t# `9 B1 T! O; H1 k: e
www2.tvboxnow.com& V, b/ ~' u/ k1 l, I$ b' ~5 a0 l& I
Every business day, American consumers buy $1 billion more in Chinese exports than American manufacturers sell to China, and China alone accounts for about 70% of America's trade deficit in goods, excluding oil imports. This "Chinese import dependence" has led a democratic America to owe the largest communist nation in the world more than $1 trillion, while China holds more than $3 trillion in foreign reserves, most of them in U.S. dollars.TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。' u6 ]! f0 }: B* N
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。. w1 X. F! t, b) q3 c s( D
To put these dollar reserves in perspective, that's more than enough money for China to buy a controlling interest in every major company in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, including Alcoa, Caterpillar, Exxon Mobil and Wal-Mart, and still leave billions to spare.3 q7 K+ \: L) Q$ h# S8 m
公仔箱論壇. O) E% L# g# F) T# k
So how can we eliminate, or at least drastically reduce, our trade deficit with China? For starters, we must puncture the myth that China's main manufacturing edge is solely its cheap labor. Indeed, while low labor costs are a factor, when you carefully research the biggest source of China's manufacturing advantage, it is actually a complex array of unfair trade practices, all of which are illegal under free-trade rules.5 m9 U5 x1 a O6 n/ D" W2 Z
3 F) [8 } I' e7 f( Dwww2.tvboxnow.comThe most potent of China's "weapons of job destruction" are an elaborate web of export subsidies; the blatant piracy of America's technologies and trade secrets; the counterfeiting of valuable brand names like Nike and Chevy; a cleverly manipulated and grossly undervalued currency; and the forced transfer of the technology of any American company wishing to operate on Chinese soil or sell into the Chinese market.www2.tvboxnow.com5 V4 E6 I g8 v# R" W3 c- K
1 X4 g7 H8 ^4 [7 @
Each of these unfair trade practices is expressly prohibited both by World Trade Organization rules as well as rules established by the U.S. government, e.g., the Treasury Department has sanctions against currency manipulation (which, alas, the Obama administration refuses to use against China despite campaign promises to do so). b" X$ T- }) o* mwww2.tvboxnow.com9 D1 d& K! N8 D+ S+ u9 P" O
) W$ A& H: S( t0 l! u; B公仔箱論壇In addition, there is the Chinese Communist Party's incredibly shortsighted willingness to trade tremendous environmental damage and a surfeit of workplace deaths and injuries for a few more pennies of production cost advantage, all because of ultra-lax regulatory standards. For example, according to the World Health Organization, almost 700,000 Chinese citizens die annually from the effects of air pollution — that's like losing everybody in Wyoming every year — while Chinese officials acknowledge more than 2,000 coal mining deaths annually, compared with fewer than 50 in the United States. / X L/ k M& Q7 P$ q) {+ B# O6 i
Make no mistake. All of these real economic weapons have led to the shutdown of thousands of American factories and turned millions of American workers into collateral damage, all under the false flag of so-called free trade. J' j4 T# Z- q" X0 e( ? & E" E6 Y: { V& Swww2.tvboxnow.comThe second myth we must expose if we are to ever reverse the job-killing trade deficits we now run with China is the idea that free trade always benefits both countries. That doesn't hold true if one country cheats on the other. Instead, when a mercantilist China uses unfair trade practices to wage war on our manufacturing base, the American economy is the big loser. 6 P. }; d9 t! |5 o b/ T- _1 d9 b8 t1 ~7 ~; A- t% \7 b, Y6 P' Z
Given America's structural problem with China and absent constructive trade reform, our economic prospects can only dim further. The presidential candidate who grasps that essential truth, which is becoming increasingly understood by much of the electorate, will be the one who wins in 2012. We need someone who can lead this country to a trade relationship with China founded on the American ideals of free and fair trade rather than a set of mercantilist and socialist trade policies that employ the Chinese masses at the expense of American workers. + t* \- R" {4 N+ |+ Z; b3 Ptvb now,tvbnow,bttvb公仔箱論壇9 K7 w" c) F1 V$ ?7 U( ] Peter Navarro is a business professor at UC Irvine, a CNBC contributor and the coauthor with Greg Autry of "Death by China: Confronting the Dragon — A Global Call to Action." # u) \: _/ d3 f8 B/ G' C9 v3 K公仔箱論壇) K; w3 C7 j( i5 Q. s. n
/ X1 h2 H8 l. h) a, b. Xwww2.tvboxnow.com - i9 ^ l+ Y; B; Q來源 / 版權所有： Los Angeles Times4 O6 M" `& \) P' R) S
(以上内容摘自或摘译自 Los Angeles Times，不代表發帖者观点)作者: diandeng 時間: 2011-6-26 02:58 PM
