「暫時失明」這點很有保留. 不少軍警引入新型「非致命武器」都聲稱沒有永久傷害, 但後果總會發現有後遺症. 這次只不過是借機引入新的強力武器方便執法. 對民權往往弊多於利.作者: ckd08 時間: 2011-12-13 04:33 AM
Well. this SMU100 laser gun is currently being used by troops in Afghanistan. It proofs to be quite effective to blind the enemies in very short period of time just like to watch the sun at noon. The original idea was to use this wall of light to blind the pirates so that the shipping companies can be safe. I guess next stop will be for public use if the damage can be proved to be short period of time. Would you like one for your home security ?作者: samhau 時間: 2011-12-14 12:06 AM
well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.www2.tvboxnow.com) ~+ i$ c& P& U/ m' ^; a
公仔箱論壇) }/ K+ ^0 Z4 c+ g
i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.公仔箱論壇& B' j" v4 f7 }( |1 w; W
1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb0 t4 ~! ?3 A2 |3 \
2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing.
