. e s7 o+ g! [0 ?$ X, `3 g; p註1：原文為「On constitutional arrangements, we did not succeed in persuading the Chinese that the Chief Executive of Hong Kong should be elected immediately in 1997 (although the agreement does leave open the possibility that he might be so elected). But throughout the negotiations we have had the closest consultations with the Executive Council. We have brought them to accept at each point that we had achieved the maximum that was possible from the Chinese.」 2 K. z+ P" Q) H2 v2 j1 i% X$ h: n* P L ]0 `: n
www2.tvboxnow.com/ y3 R. e# S0 k! ~; `
註2：「We believe that what we have today is a reasonable agreement, the best that can be achieved, and one which we can commend to the people of Hong Kong in good conscience.」 0 d* ^) Z+ t2 b/ E- Z2 a! x0 hTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。公仔箱論壇0 z }7 P- }% P% O. p* B
www2.tvboxnow.com1 n1 k3 @4 j# Y
註3：「The Chinese are known to be opposed to direct elections and generally wary of the development of representative institutions. But they have agreed that the Agreement should provide for an elected legislature after 1997. It will be impracticable to introduce direct elections without at least the tacit acquiescence of the Chinese.」tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb' |. Y8 R& G9 m/ w: m+ s& H
& K( u& Z h' w Q, v公仔箱論壇公仔箱論壇5 H7 k1 g& |, J$ A+ I
註4：「Wu noted from your message that we were prepared to accept the Chinese position that the Chief Executive of the SAR should be selected by election or consultation. After careful consideration, the Chinese side were prepared in return to agree to the two requests in your message, i.e.: (a) that the text of Annex 1 should state that the legislature should be selected by an elective process (semicolon) and(b) that the executive authority should be accountable to the legislature.」. A) `4 t C3 n" @& F6 A- S* f
8 C8 O& _0 k- O( _% _2 i+ o4 A$ X4 O" M
註5：「This is another big step forward. They have accepted our points on the constitutional arrangements;」（「big step forward」和「our points on the constitutional arrangements」都有畫線。） & l, v! N. Z: P! i. |/ JTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 ' @: X7 m3 L4 n6 oTVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。 ' S% H: r, a% N; N7 V# ^TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。註6：「Zhou said that the Chinese position was firm. The structure of the future SAR government would be stipulated in the Basic Law. The Chinese proposed that the agreement should state that the chief executive should be chosen by election or consultation.This was reasonable, because it would in practice be difficutl（原文串法）to per-determined the method by which he should be chosen.」 * C/ k8 A% P, r6 T) u6 Q [& Cwww2.tvboxnow.com 5 @8 s1 }: I: D& k% o/ J! T. v ' ]$ r' L( d& k# ~- B" Q+ @2 e& L1 c註7：「Next is the question of constitutional arrangements. The Chinese are refusing to commit themselves on the structure of government after 1997 beyond saying that the Chief Executive of the Hong Kong SAR should be chosen “by election or consultation". They have refused to specify that the legislature will be elected or the executive authority should be answerable to the legislature. We see an elected legislature as fundamental to the autonomy of the future Hong Kong SAR and must press for it strongly. Here I proposed saying that we should be prepared to accept the Chinese line that the Chief Executive could be chosen by election or consultation in return for a statement that the legislature should be elected and that the executive should be answerable to it.」 + s3 y; A5 ?% v0 @/ q5 u2 ]www2.tvboxnow.com公仔箱論壇/ e* ]7 Q/ H% s x' @- g/ ` Q
5 W d$ e4 t; n, Y- W這種提名方式，即使說並不是「機構提名」，但其「必須擁有某種特殊身份」的人才有提名資格，也又不能否定。至於其他方案，主要是由「選舉團/顧問團」等等機構進行選舉，而不是「普選」。當中只有「第五方案」也含普選安排，而被接納為《基本法》的文字藍本。7 q/ P$ |$ G; d6 t
3 R; w7 `: O: t1 X$ `1 I草稿的寫法是：由 「香港特別行政區行政長官提名委員會」經協商或協商後投票程序提名三人，全港選民一人一票產生。 5 [. M; x% X [* U$ R l) @/ X9 L* R1 B4 ~& P: a% H
請大家注意，尤其是喜歡「捉字虱」的各位，「提名委員會」在文本之中，是有「括號」的噢，換言之，那是一個組織的專有名詞稱謂，而這個組織有三個程序：協商、提名、轉交普選。這個還不是「機構提名」又可以是什麼？而在討論之後，最終得出更為民主的安排是不再用「協商」而改為「按民主程序提名」。而唯一分別，就是在定稿時，沒有對「提名委員會」加上專有名詞的括號！www2.tvboxnow.com+ H! A$ g' G* y# E' j& J6 e" ]
TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。! j$ d; {6 H" Q4 y/ G$ o4 {
按此英國法理，即使任何人要拿着這個所謂「僭建」來造文章的話，也還得要考慮政府有權「將訴訟進行到底」。" ^; S& i. a; M
公仔箱論壇9 }8 D8 s8 P2 k
要追求民主？好呀；不要篩選？好呀，全部都贊成。之不過，假如要「司法覆核」，到底法庭又會如何判斷呢？就是「按照基本法的立法原意是….」。大家以為可以填一些進去呢？TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。* `. P6 c' A1 N/ m
www2.tvboxnow.com& p4 e; [) R8 @- K: z1 Y. p- t6 R0 Q
而假如民主居然是要「騙」回來的話，那麼這個條文就本來沒有什麼意義了吧， anything goes! 8 e! H. {2 P0 Hwww2.tvboxnow.com6 R; F0 h# {* z
0 J, x6 @7 k+ ?tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb # ^8 r' i5 t+ I公仔箱論壇蕭少滔, 香港中文大學工商管理學院本科生校友會會長、 (前) 香港中文大學學生會辯論學會首席顧問、香港中文大學辯論隊校友會主席、香港中文大學工商管理學院(國際商業/法律) HEC School of Management Paris, (Financial Engineer, Geopolitics) 恒生商學書院 香港華仁書院TVBNOW 含有熱門話題，最新最快電視，軟體，遊戲，電影，動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。& @, d; W' Q$ R: o5 F1 M1 G; b
