well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb0 \3 x& U. X# \; v! K9 L
6 v) ?" w4 l+ f Ji have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons. f& h# W$ V# {' M2 s* Z. N% A
1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.
- S1 v& T- g1 c# S' ^' f2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing. |
發表於 2011-12-12 05:29 PM
| 
