well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.
x2 j' A, Y* q% J, i& j" e' b. E. b* ^& Q) T! `, k; o: G z5 I8 K
i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.
# [% y5 M2 b% W: y" p) @& w1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.
2 L( N$ H6 e1 i2 U' _www2.tvboxnow.com2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing. |
發表於 2011-12-12 05:29 PM
| 
