返回列表 回復 發帖
「暫時失明」這點很有保留. 不少軍警引入新型「非致命武器」都聲稱沒有永久傷害, 但後果總會發現有後遺症. 這次只不過是借機引入新的強力武器方便執法. 對民權往往弊多於利.
1

評分次數

  • aa00

well, if it is permitted, i'd like to have every weapon available to protect my home. "my home", i mean--which is tantamount to one's castle.
& Q4 t/ l' Q# g4 P& d3 ITVBNOW 含有熱門話題,最新最快電視,軟體,遊戲,電影,動漫及日常生活及興趣交流等資訊。tvb now,tvbnow,bttvb$ ~, W4 W9 K1 @4 t( ?- g
i have great reservation, though, for police/army [police, especially] to procure for any new powerful "non-lethal" weapons.公仔箱論壇( s" g0 ^( P; q- [
1. they often claim those new weapons to be "non-lethal" and that the adverse effects are just temporary. but the adverse effects of most of those weapons, would later be proved to be not so temporary.
8 R0 y6 Y* b. b. d3 Uwww2.tvboxnow.com2. and they simply want to make their job easy. and to be more efficient in supressing the people. and i don't see it as a good thing.
1

評分次數

  • aa00

返回列表