返回列表 回復 發帖

飛機師 Vs 飛機工程師

唔知點解劇中講到 飛機維修 好似做地盤一樣?" _, b8 i8 B: _( M1 Y9 e+ t
9 z& p. }1 v$ S9 `6 p* Z
就算做到飛機工程師都係一樣!9 Z: y- a+ C+ b* ?" Z
1 B, q& l5 g, N( R! x3 @$ c9 ?
雖然物理上真係一個在天、一個在地。
真的。。。不解释了
事實係咁
) X; b# C3 e. V$ Z我十年前都差D去左做維修員公仔箱論壇/ N4 g9 z+ s5 ~5 D& T
同做文員差唔多個價 中三就做到
really? i thought you need a university degree
飛機師人工高D
做維修只是技工,叫工程師只是好聽
如果做到夏晨這個位有三萬五至四萬人工,照哥是工程師有4萬至4萬5人工。屬於專業人事。
提示: 作者被禁止或刪除 內容自動屏蔽
totally agree
They are not engineer, they are mechanics, like a car mechanics you see in the garage.
3 V: ^2 ]$ }7 x( D; o公仔箱論壇# Y/ V5 R1 ~2 `. C9 Z) n5 f
Engineer actually need to create/build something. Plane Engineer build/design planes, what these people in the drama does are just mechanics, they repairs and replace planes.
+ g6 M+ n- N7 q$ @tvb now,tvbnow,bttvbwww2.tvboxnow.com/ Q+ W5 g5 J* a
Engineer wrote plane instruction manuals, 夏晨's mechanic team read and follow it.
aircraft engineering isn't that good of a job in hk.. specially the paid, on the other hand, pilots as second officer earn more than being an licensed engineer.. and free sandwiches too so=sandwich eaters
Pilot's salary always is better...
我認為維修的只應該稱技工,設計製造的才可叫工程師,
呢個世界係咁架啦, PILOT 係最巴閉~
飛機師當然是人工好啦...要講天份的.....
返回列表